DEMO BUILD · corrected architecture · not attached to production DNS · noindex/nofollow · see all page types
AttorneysOnline.Directory
Home / Answers / Divorce Mediation / Are Your Unique Prenup Terms Actually Valid?
Divorce Mediation · answered on camera

Are Your Unique Prenup Terms Actually Valid?

Quick answer

Unusual prenup clauses—who cooks, who cleans, or a large payout for staying sober—aren't automatically valid, divorce attorney Bill Leininger explains. Courts require terms to be reasonable, and a provision isn't necessarily void just for being unusual. The real obstacle is enforceability: unlike a drug test, defining and proving something like 'drinking to excess' is very hard.

Excerpt summaries from the video and transcripts · how we make them

Answered by Bill Leininger · Sarasota, FL and Staten Island, NY

Highlights

0:49

— the sobriety-payout clause that sparks the enforceability question

1:52

— the micromanaging clauses Leininger has seen written into prenups

3:01

— whether rewarding sobriety violates public policy

3:46

— when a large per-year payout is fair versus unreasonable

6:39

— why defining 'drinking to excess' makes such a clause hard to enforce

Frequently Asked Questions

Are unusual prenup terms automatically valid?

No. A clause—like a large payout for staying sober—isn't automatically valid, though it isn't void just for being unusual; courts require the terms to be reasonable.

What kinds of clauses do people write into prenups?

People sometimes include micromanaging terms covering things like who cooks or cleans, which courts tend to view skeptically.

Does rewarding sobriety violate public policy?

It raises the question—rewarding sobriety may or may not run afoul of public policy, which is part of what makes such clauses uncertain.

When is a large payout clause fair?

A large per-year payout can be reasonable or unreasonable depending on the circumstances, and courts weigh whether it's fair before enforcing it.

Why are sobriety clauses hard to enforce?

Unlike a clear drug test, defining and proving something like 'drinking to excess' is very difficult, which makes the clause hard to enforce in practice.

→ Full interview on Attorneys.Media

Contact Bill Leininger
Answered by

Bill Leininger
Divorce Mediation For New York Residents

69 filmed answers · full profile →

Build note · one page per video, built from the directory database: this video’s own Quick answer, Law update where one applies, Highlights and Q&A, attributed to its attorney. Nothing on it is quoted verbatim and no interview text is reproduced — the full interview stays on Attorneys.Media, linked above.