Legal news archive
Every item ever ingested, 2075 total. Nothing is deleted or overwritten as new items arrive -- this page just paginates further back.
USA v. Ellis
DECISION AND ORDER denying 27 Motion to Suppress as to Rondell Ellis (1); adopting Report and Recommendations re 32 Report and Recommendations as to Rondell Ellis (1). Also affirming Decision and Order 33. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 9/21/2026.(MJK)
2026-09-21 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Wellington v. USA
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge David H. Urias denying without prejudice 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) and denying as moot 14 Motion to Expedite Ruling on Pending 2255 Motion. (gr)
2026-09-21 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
USA v. Escobar
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jennifer M. Rozzoni granting 31 Motion for Release from Custody as to Karl Devain Escobar (1) (kms)
2026-09-21 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Uphoff v. Lemond et al
OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant John S. Uphoff's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims 26 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendants John Uphoff, Matt Duea, Allen Temiz, Anthony Brennan, Raw Entertainment Ltd., Packdraw US, LLC, and Packdraw Ltd's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint 30 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. See Order for specifics. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Eric C. Tostrud on 9/21/2026. (RMM)
2026-09-21 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
POLAND v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
ORDER ON UPS' MOTION TO DISMISS granting in part and denying in part 9 Motion to Dismiss By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (CCS)
2026-09-21 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Laird v. Click Here Publishing
roceed only as to Plaintiff's claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on 9/21/2026. (BLR)RULING and ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the 9 Motion for Partial Dismissal, filed by Defendant Click Here Publishing d/b/a Click Here Digital, is GRANTED. Plaintiff's state law claims under the Louisiana Employment Discrimination Law and the Louisiana Unfair Trade Practices Act, as well as Plaintiff's alternative state law claims for negligence and negligent misrepresentation, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE because these claims are prescribed and/or fail to state a claim. This case will p
2026-09-21 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
TILL v. STUDENT TRANSPORTATION OF AMERICA INC
ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. An in-person settlement conference is scheduled in this matter for Tuesday, October 13, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. (CDT) in either Courtroom 3 South (3rd Floor) or Courtroom 4 South (4th Floor), One North Palafox Street, Pensacola, Florida 32502. On or before October 6, 2026, each party must provide a settlement statement marked "confidential" to the office of the Magistrate Judge via hand-delivery, mail, or e-mail (Carey_King@flnd.uscourts.gov). No later than three (3) days before the conference, counsel shall also submit via email, and in Microsoft Word format, a joint settlement agreement which contains all terms agreed to by the parties, such as mutual releases, dismissal with prejudice, and confidentiality; and leaving blank any disputed terms, such as the settlement amount. (SEE FULL ORDER). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES J KAHN, JR on 9/21/2026. (cjk)
2026-09-21 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Gomez v. MSC Cruises, S.A.
ORDER granting 4 Motion to Compel Arbitration. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 9/21/2026. See attached document for full details. (ia00)
2026-09-21 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Fyffe v. State of Connecticut Department of Correction et al
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 74 Motion to Dismiss. See attached for dtails. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 9/21/26. (RW)
2026-09-21 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Tamayama v. United States of America
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 3: FURTHER AMENDED CASE SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 9/21/2026. Pretrial Conference reset for 3/18/2027 at 2:00 p.m. in San Francisco, Courtroom 08, 19th Floor before Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Bench Trial reset for 4/5/2027 to 4/13/2027 (7-days) at 8:30 a.m. in San Francisco, Courtroom 08, 19th Floor before Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2026)
2026-09-21 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Lindsey v. Arney et al
enior Judge James A Teilborg on 9/21/2026. (MCB)ORDER - The Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 36) is denied. The Clerk of the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(4), to immediately notify Plaintiff and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of this Order. Signed by S
2026-09-21 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
LaPorta v. Corporation for Public Broadcasting et al
ORDER granting NPR's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 23) and the SBA's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 44). All claims against NPR and the SBA are DISMISSED without prejudice and without leave to amend for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.FURTHER ORDERED dismissing all claims against the State of Nevada for lack of subject matter jurisdiction without prejudice and without leave to amend. FURTHER ORDERED dismissing all claims against Clark County brought on behalf of LVPRI for lack of subject matter jurisdiction without prejudice and without leave to amend. FURTHER ORDERED denying LaPorta's Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 19) and Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 28). FINALLY ORDERED directing LaPorta to show cause, by no later than 10/6/2026, why the remainder of his complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim given the defects identified above. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this case without further order if LaPorta fails to respond to this order to show cause within the time allowed. See attached for additional information. Signed by Judge Sharad H. Desai on 9/21/2026. (RMW)
2026-09-21 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Bailey v. Reach, Inc.
ORDER denying without prejudice MOTION for Summary Judgment at Docket 27 filed by Ibn Bailey. Signed by Judge Aaron Christian Peterson on 9/21/2026. (JRF, COURT STAFF)
2026-09-21 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
In the Matter of the Marriage of Claire Noel Callahan and Matthew John Lewis and in the Interest of A.C.C., a Child v. the State of Texas
The court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s decision to change the child’s last name to Lewis, rejecting the mother’s choice to give the child the surname Callahan without the father’s input. The appellate court also upheld the custody arrangement, overruling the mother’s objection that the possession schedule should align with her older child’s. Because these rulings were affirmed, the court determined the condition for the conditional award of $45,000 in appellate attorney’s fees to the mother was not triggered.
2026-09-21 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
State v. Rendle
Evelyn Rendle moved for sentence modification after violating probation due to possession of controlled substances and driving while under the influence, seeking to reduce her Level V sentence and eliminate her Level III sentence to move to North Carolina. The Delaware Superior Court reviewed the motion under Rule 35(b) and found no procedural bars, though it ultimately ruled that the original sentence was appropriate and denied the request. The Court declined to recalibrate the sentence based on the basis articulated by the Defendant.
2026-09-21 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Fields v. Aramark Campus, LLC
Plaintiff Ahki Fields, formerly employed by Aramark at Georgetown University, alleges that the company discriminated against him based on gender and race, failed to follow seniority systems regarding overtime, and terminated him for recording a disciplinary meeting and inconsistencies with uniform regulations. The court granted Aramark’s Motion to Partially Dismiss in part and Georgetown University’s Motion to Dismiss in full.
2026-09-21 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Newton v. LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton Inc.
Andowah Newton appeals the dismissal of her retaliation lawsuit alleging she was fired after reporting sexual harassment, arguing that the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act invalidates an otherwise binding arbitration agreement. The Second Circuit reversed the district court's decision to dismiss her initial complaint, determining that she plausibly alleged engaging in protected activity by refusing to meet with her supervisor to settle arbitration claims. The court, however, affirmed the denial of her request to amend her complaint, holding that the claims she sought to add accrued prior to the statute's effective date and did not reaccrue.
2026-09-21 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Gilmer v. Noem
Chadwick Gilmer, a gay man over the age of forty, filed a lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security alleging discrimination and retaliation based on his sexual orientation and age stemming from his interactions with a supervisor. The defendant moved to dismiss the case, and the opinion text states that "for the reasons that follow, the Court will grant the motion."
2026-09-21 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
DiFronzo v. City of Somerville
A federal appeals court reversed a judgment in a Massachusetts employment dispute involving a police officer who challenged a termination after he had already been reinstated through arbitration. The court determined that the trial judge improperly permitted the plaintiff to present evidence regarding a decision to place him on paid administrative leave—a motive not alleged in the complaint—as a basis for damages. Consequently, the ruling applies only to the portion of the judgment awarding damages based on the paid leave decision.
2026-09-21 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
In re: estate of Miller
This case arose from a will contest where Michelle Zwerling challenged a will left by her uncle that named Patricia Kahn as executor, arguing it was a forgery and the product of undue influence. The trial court admitted the will to probate and, after a full trial, upheld its validity. The appellate court affirmed that decision, ruling that the trial court’s admission of the will was a substantial ruling and that the motion to substitute the judge was untimely.
2026-09-21 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
In Re Camille Gray v. the State of Texas
Camille Gray sought emergency extraordinary writs from the Fourth Court of Appeals to halt a setting scheduled for September 21, 2026. The court determined that the relator was not entitled to mandamus or prohibition relief under applicable procedural rules. Consequently, the court denied the petition for writ of mandamus, the petition for writ of prohibition, and the emergency motion to stay.
2026-09-21 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Z.N. v. M.N.
Z.N. (Wife) appealed the Family Court’s decree granting an absolute divorce and custody award, but the Intermediate Court of Appeals affirmed the decision because the husband failed to cite specific record evidence or expressly challenge the court's findings of fact. The appellate court dismissed the appellant's arguments regarding trust assets and financial division due to procedural deficiencies in the record and lack of timely objections. Ultimately, the court sustained the entry of the divorce decree and custody award.
2026-09-21 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel., OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. W.E. PAT PATE
This case concerns the Oklahoma Supreme Court’s review of an amended resignation filed by Pat Pate in lieu of continued disciplinary proceedings, which acknowledges multiple allegations of professional misconduct including mishandling client funds and ignoring agency investigations. Upon reviewing the amended affidavit, the court determined that the resignation was freely and voluntarily tendered and that the Respondent was fully aware of the allegations and consequences.
2026-09-21 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
State v. Cheatham
Rashon L. Cheatham appealed his conviction for first-degree misdemeanor theft of a SCRAM bracelet he was ordered to wear while on a reporting bond for an unrelated offense. After a bench trial where the State's sole witness testified that Cheatham abandoned the device upon absconding, the municipal court convicted him. The Court of Appeals reversed the judgment, vacating the conviction on the grounds that the State failed to present sufficient evidence to prove the "purpose" element required for the theft charge.
2026-09-21 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
State v. Brown
The 12th Appellate District of Ohio dismissed a criminal appeal filed by Steven Brown after reviewing an Anders brief indicating that the record failed to reveal any non-frivolous constitutional errors. Despite listing one arguable error, the court found no prejudice to appellant's rights during its independent review. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal as wholly frivolous and granted the motion to withdraw as counsel.
2026-09-21 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Commonwealth v. Beechman
An Appeals Court panel affirmed a Superior Court judge’s decision to suppress a firearm found during an inventory search of a vehicle stopped for an expired registration, ruling that the impoundment was not reasonably necessary and lacked a legitimate, non-investigative purpose as required under department policy.
2026-09-21 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
State v. Allen
Jajuan Allen appeals the Marion County Court of Common Pleas’ dismissal of his petition for postconviction relief, which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. The appellant argues the trial court abused its discretion by denying the claim without a hearing on the basis of res judicata. The appellate court discusses the standard that a trial court may properly deny a postconviction petition without a hearing if the claims are barred by prior judgments.
2026-09-21 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Com. v. Thomas, C.
Clinton M. Thomas appealed convictions for possession and dissemination of child sexual abuse material, and the Superior Court affirmed his convictions for possession and the use of a communication facility while reversing his conviction for dissemination. Consequently, the court vacated the judgment of sentence, remanded the case for resentencing on the remaining counts, and granted a new trial on the dissemination count.
2026-09-21 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Patrickson v. DOW Chemical Company and Del Monte Fresh Produce N.A
This case involves Central and South American workers suing Dow Chemical and Del Monte for injuries allegedly caused by exposure to the pesticide DBCP. The Supreme Court affirmed the intermediate court's judgment and adopted the Restatement (Third) of Torts’ standard for causation, which prioritizes evaluating exposure to the agent before determining general and specific causation.
2026-09-21 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
State v. Jamison
James Jamison appeals convictions from the Butler County Area III Court for driving under the influence of alcohol and operating without reasonable control following a vehicle accident, arguing issues with the appointment of counsel and the handling of the suppression hearing. The appellate court has reversed the trial court's judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings.
2026-09-21 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Julian Darius Karapetkov v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Julian Karapetkov appealed his arson conviction and life sentence, arguing the court abused its discretion both regarding sentencing and the handling of restitution. The Court of Appeals of Virginia en banc affirmed the lower court, holding that the sentencing did not constitute an abuse of discretion and declining to invoke an "ends of justice" exception.
2026-09-21 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Greeley v. NH State Police et al
///ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, the defendants' motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 16) is granted. All other motions are denied as moot. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the case. So Ordered by Chief District Judge Samantha D. Elliott.(vln)
2026-09-18 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
USA v. Diiorio
ORDER denying 29 Motion to Suppress as to Perry James Diiorio (1). Signed by Judge William W. Mercer on 9/18/2026. (SGN)
2026-09-18 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
USA v. Lapier
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Court DENIES Lapiers motions in limine in part and GRANTS in part. Lapiers arguments regarding the allegations of him driving under the influence and money laundering are dismissed as moot. The allegations that Lapier possessed or traded in firearms and that he was involved with significant amounts of money remain relevant. Lapiers motion to exclude evidence under Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(d) is dismissed as moot. The Court directs the Government to disclose its intent, if any, to use statements or confessions made by the defendant during its case-in-chief. 2. The Court DENIES Lapiers motion for a Bill of Particulars. 3. The Court GRANTS Lapiers motion for sanctions for untimely/undisclosed Giglio information and remedies the violation with the continuance issued on September 9, 2026. (Doc. 78) Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 9/18/2026. (KAH)
2026-09-18 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Ladell Jr. v. Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc.
ORDER denying 29 Defendant's motion for attorney fees. Signed on 9/18/2026 by Senior District Judge M Douglas Harpool. (PDF)
2026-09-18 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
USA v. Frazier
District Judge Patti B. Saris: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered re 65 and 82 Motion to Suppress as to Cess Frazier. The Court ALLOWS the motion to suppress (Dkt. 65) as to Defendant's verbal statements regarding ownership of the electronic devices and the passcode to those devices but DENIES the motion as to the evidence obtained on the devices under the inevitable discovery doctrine. (CGK)
2026-09-18 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
De Paula Ataide Almeida v. Moniz et al
District Judge Angel Kelley: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. For the reasons stated in the attached memorandum, Petitioner’s 21 Motion to Enforce is GRANTED. Respondents are ORDERED to release Petitioner immediately. Petitioner’s 26 MOTION to Expedite is DENIED AS MOOT.(CEH)
2026-09-18 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
COASTAL LAWN CARE INC et al v. WRIGHT et al
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT NANCY WRIGHT'S MOTION TO DISMISS re: 12 Motion to Dismiss By JUDGE STACEY D. NEUMANN. (mjlt)
2026-09-18 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
State v. Gardner
The State appealed a district court’s decision to suppress statements obtained after defendant Terica Gardner invoked her right to counsel. The Court of Appeals affirmed that suppression order, finding that the record supports the district court's conclusion that Gardner unequivocally requested an attorney.
2026-09-18 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
SCOTT v. WEN SOUTH LLC et al
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The report and recommendation (ECF 26) is adopted in part and rejected in part, as set out above. All claims against Tabitha Tarver, Todd Tuller, Mykayla Ross, and Chastanna Green are dismissed without prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to effect timely service. The motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 9, 18) are GRANTED in part as set out above. The Title VII and FCRA claims against Wendy's International, LLC, and Wen South, LLC, are dismissed without prejudice for lack of exhaustion. The complaint is otherwise stricken as a shotgun pleading. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint against Wendy's International and Wen South by 10/2/2026. If Plaintiff does timely amend, Wendy's International and Wen South will have 14 days to respond (10/16/2026). Signed by CHIEF JUDGE ALLEN C WINSOR on 9/18/2026. (atm) Modified on 9/21/2026 to create links (atm).
2026-09-18 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)