Legal news archive
Every item ever ingested, 2084 total. Nothing is deleted or overwritten as new items arrive -- this page just paginates further back.
PARTL-BROWN v. DCFS AGENCY OF COLLINSVILLE IL
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 7/13/2026. (zmtm)
2026-07-13 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Davis, Joel v. Thompson, Tillmer et al
OPINION AND ORDER granting 8 Motion to Dismiss, and plaintiff's Joel Davis' claims are dismissed as barred by the applicable statute of limitations. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 7/13/2026. (nln),(ps)
2026-07-13 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Buksh et al v. Dr. William Sarchino DPM Foot and Ankle Surgeon et al
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 222 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Shazad Buksh; granting 228 Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff Buksh's Claims. Signed by Judge William K. Sessions III on 7/13/2026. (law)
2026-07-13 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Bourne et al v. Liker et al
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (dm)
2026-07-13 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Rice v. Truthfinder, LLC et al.
efore August 3, 2026. The Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 21) and Motion to Compel (ECF No. 23) are DENIED AS MOOT. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond by August 24, 2026. Judge Charles Esque Fleming on 7/13/2026. (S,SR)Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 28) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file the proposed second amended complaint (Doc. No. 28-1), along with all exhibits, on or b
2026-07-13 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
State v. Morgan
The Supreme Court vacated the Court of Appeals’ opinion and held that a police officer possessed sufficient reasonable suspicion to detain James Morgan based on observations concerning a reported fight and noise violation. The court ruled that evidence of crimes committed following the seizure was suppressed because the original stop was justified, making the appellate application of the “new crime exception” unnecessary to decide.
2026-07-13 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Holtec International v. Javerbaum Wurgaft Hicks Kahn Wikstrom & Sinins, Pc
Holtec International appealed the dismissal of a defamation complaint against the law firm Javerbaum over a webpage article regarding a whistleblower lawsuit. The appellate court held that New Jersey's anti-SLAPP law applied to the firm's speech and that the commercial speech exemption did not apply, thereby affirming the dismissal of Holtec's complaint with prejudice.
2026-07-13 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
State v. Burries
Anthony L. Burries challenges the district court’s decision to deny without an evidentiary hearing his third amended motion for postconviction relief following his first-degree murder conviction. The Nebraska Supreme Court finds no merit to Burries’ specific assignments of error and arguments, and it affirms the district court’s judgment.
2026-07-10 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Bocanegra v. Gonzalez
Following a judgment for injuries from an automobile accident, a garnishment court held that the defendant’s liability policy did not cover the incident, denoted the plaintiff’s request to reform the policy, and entered a judgment discharging the garnishee. The Nebraska Supreme Court vacated that portion of the judgment, finding the lower court lacked jurisdiction to consider the merits of the policy reform request. The court otherwise affirmed the judgment discharging the insurer.
2026-07-10 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Jean H. Ramsey v. Frank Ramsey, III, as of the Estate of Frank v. Ramsey, Jr.
These three appeals involve family disputes stemming from an irrevocable trust and a postnuptial agreement reached by a couple during a divorce proceeding. The court issued an opinion stating that it affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded the case.
2026-07-10 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Frank Ramsey, III, as of the Estate of Frank v. Ramsey, Jr. v. Cynthia Ramsey Cooper
These appeals stem from a family dispute regarding an irrevocable trust established under a settlement agreement executed between a husband and wife in 2013, concerning the division of assets after sixty years of marriage. The Kentucky Court of Appeals issued an opinion affirming in part, reversing in part, and remanding the case after reviewing the extensive trial record and cross-appeals filed by the parties.
2026-07-10 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Beam v. Dater-Twomey, et al.
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER BY SCREENING JUDGE - Signed by Judge Amanda K Brailsford. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd)
2026-07-10 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
In re Parentage of A.L.G
This opinion reviews post-trial appeals in a long-running parenting case involving Stephen Guzman, Breanne Selin, and their child, regarding legal conduct, monetary sanctions, and various motions. The court reversed direct criminal contempt findings against the mother's attorney for speaking objections but affirmed the monetary sanctions ordered against her. The court affirmed the denial of appeals concerning child support and insurance but reversed the denial of a motion to change the child's name and remanded for further proceedings on retroactive child support.
2026-07-10 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Charlie May Brekke v. Midwest Medical Ins. Co.
Charlie May Brekke sued her physician for negligence and a failure to obtain informed consent regarding the delivery of her child via surrogate. The circuit court dismissed her informed consent claim, ruling that the statute did not grant her an independent right to sue as an unborn or minor patient. The Wisconsin Supreme Court reversed this ruling, holding that an unborn child is a patient under the statute and possesses an independent right to pursue an informed consent claim for medical treatment.
2026-07-10 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Hatfield v. Bonneville County, et al.
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt.59) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt.60) is DENIED. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice.The Court will enter judgment separately. Signed by Judge Amanda K Brailsford. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ac)
2026-07-09 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Estate of O'farrell v. O'farrell
Paul O’Farrell commenced a civil action against trusts and corporations seeking rescission of a land sale and damages, but the circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants and denied his request for further discovery. The Supreme Court of South Dakota affirmed the grant of summary judgment and the denial of a discovery motion, but vacated the court’s denial of a motion to amend the complaint, a request for a witness examination, and an order regarding attorney fees.
2026-07-09 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
USA v. Urena-Jimenez et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 24 Motion to Suppress as to Americo Urena-Jimenez (1), Fausto Urena-Jimenez (2). So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 7/9/2026.(Jackson, Ryan) (Main Document 33 replaced on 7/9/2026) (Jackson, Ryan).MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 24 Motion to Suppress as to Americo Urena-Jimenez (1), Fausto Urena-Jimenez (2). So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 7/9/2026.(Jackson, Ryan) (Main Document 33 replaced on 7/9/2026) (Jackson, Ryan).
2026-07-09 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
State v. Leron Porter
State v. Leron Porter involves the defendant appealing a conviction for second-degree murder and firearms offenses, specifically alleging that the state violated his Batson rights during jury selection by striking the sole African-American juror. The text outlines that the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit concluded that the Rhode Island Supreme Court’s previous ruling on the strike was unreasonable, though the provided portion of the opinion does not state the final decision of the current Court.
2026-07-09 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
State v. R.F.P.
The Court considered whether a trial judge correctly applied the *Chambers* standard by granting an in-camera review of a sexual assault victim’s medical records to assess if her mental illnesses caused her to perceive, recall, or recount events untruthfully. The Court held that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in finding that the defendant established a substantial and particularized need for the records. This decision dealt only with the initial stage of the discovery analysis, requiring the judge to determine whether the information is relevant and material before full disclosure.
2026-07-09 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Christensen v. Christensen
The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court’s judgment requiring Jeffrey Christensen to pay $12,101.47 to his ex-wife for the equity lost in a repossessed minivan after he failed to provide the necessary sale documentation. However, the appellate court reversed the district court’s judgment of $5,684 in unpaid child support because the lower court failed to hold a required hearing.
2026-07-09 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Tuck v. Fleetwood
ORDER AND REASONS granting 6 Motion to Dismiss; Plaintiff is granted leave to amend the Complaint by 7/28/2026 as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Greg Gerard Guidry on 7/8/2026. (lag)
2026-07-08 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
USA v. Avila-Murillo
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 7/7/2026 granting in part and denying in part 24 Motion to Suppress. Avila Murillo'spre-Miranda statements shall be excluded from the evidence. All other requests to suppress evidence are DENIED. Status Conference set for 7/15/2026 at 2:00 PM in Louisville Courtroom before Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings. cc: Counsel (JM)
2026-07-08 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
In the Matter of The Tracy M. Dvorak Trust Dated September 10, 2019
Amber Kochevar appealed the district court’s denial of her motion for summary judgment, arguing that the Probate Code governs the trust and that the Trust Code prohibits releasing a resigning trustee from liability. The appellate court affirmed the district court’s decision, finding that the Trust Code applies to trusts not established by court decree and that Amber remains liable for the breach of trust claims. Consequently, the district court’s refusal to grant absolute release from liability was upheld.
2026-07-08 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Rhoda Shaw, Cynthia Beck v. Bobby Shaw, Deanna Fox Shaw and Thomas Spade
This appeal concerns a dispute over competing interstate jurisdiction between an Arizona guardianship proceeding and an Idaho quiet title action regarding the ownership of real property in Idaho. The Idaho Supreme Court affirmed the district court’s judgment, rejecting arguments that the Idaho court was required to enforce the Arizona court's findings and upholding the decision to quiet title to the property in the defendants' names.
2026-07-08 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Shane Roy Needham v. Janet Lea Needham
The Supreme Court of Idaho reversed a district court’s decision affirming a magistrate court’s order to award the wife equal shares in a closely held corporation rather than a monetary sum reflecting the value of her community interest. The Court found the magistrate court abused its discretion in fashioning the in-kind award to dissolve corporate deadlock caused by the husband’s legal action. As a result, the judgment and attorney fees are reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
2026-07-08 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Adena Health Sys. v. Cohen
Adena Health System and Adena Medical Group sued three doctors for alleged contract violations shortly after they resigned and were terminated, while the doctors counterclaimed against the hospital. The trial court ruled that the doctors were not employees-at-will and denied their request for monetary damages tied to a non-compete clause. The appellate court affirmed the trial court’s decision in part and reversed certain other holdings, ordering the case remanded for further proceedings.
2026-07-08 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
FOSTER v. J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT, INC. et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, (Doc. 18), is GRANTED. Signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 07/08/2026. (at)
2026-07-08 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Moffat v. Srebro
Nathaniel Moffat, as trustee, appealed a probate court decision awarding one of the family's real properties to Sarah Srebro and ordering him to personally reimburse the Trust for attorney’s fees following a conclusion that he breached his fiduciary duties. The appellate court affirmed these rulings, rejecting the argument that the trial court incorrectly exercised its equitable discretion in distributing the property and ordering the repayment.
2026-07-07 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
BUTLER v. WILLIE et al
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION AND IMPOSING FILING WARNING adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 15 Recommended Decision; granting 20 Emergency MOTION for Extension of Time to File Objections to the Recommended Decision; granting in part and denying in part 22 Motion for Leave to Amend/Request to File Supplemental Amended Pleading; denying 25 Motion to Supplement Record and for Limited Identification Discovery; denying as moot 26 Motion to Supplement Record / Motion to Recognize Lack of Probable Cause Based on Stale and Non-Criminal North Carolina Custody History; denying 28 Motion to Compel Access to Courts Relief; granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion for Leave to File; denying 12 Motion Request for Legal Copies. By JUDGE LANCE E. WALKER. (slg)
2026-07-07 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Wisconsin Voter Alliance v. Kristina Secord
The Wisconsin Supreme Court decided that Notice of Voting Eligibility forms are "closed" records under state statute § 54.75 and affirmed the lower courts in finding that the plaintiff is not entitled to a writ of mandamus or disclosure of the documents. The decision relies on the legislature’s choice to protect the privacy of individuals subject to guardianship proceedings by keeping records pertaining to incompetency findings closed.
2026-07-07 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Baillargeon v. NH Attorney General
///REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint. For the foregoing reasons, the magistrate judge recommends as follows: 1. The district judge should dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 2. To the extent the Petition seeks relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, the district judge should decline to issue a certificate of appealability. 3. Then, judgment should be entered, and the clerk should close this case. So Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Andrea K Johnstone.(vln)
2026-07-06 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Case Name in Immigration Case - Unavailable
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: The remaining claim in the petition for habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is hereby denied as moot, with the result that the petition in its entirety has been granted in part and denied in part. Petitioner's motion to enforce the Court's prior order requiring a bond hearing (Doc. # 9) is hereby denied. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 07/06/2026. Mailed to pro se party Euilmer Guerrero Cordova by regular mail. (smnd)
2026-07-06 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Kirk v. Harris County Child Support et al
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 2 Complaint filed by Roderick Edward Kirk. Objections to R&R due by 7/23/2026. Signed by Honorable Spencer G Singleton on July 6, 2026. (ria)
2026-07-06 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
USA v. Haynes
ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS as to Loronya Haynes: The Report and Recommendation at Docket 46 is REJECTED in part and ADOPTED in part. Defendant's Motion to Suppress at Docket 19 is DENIED. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 7/6/2026. (ANM, COURT STAFF)
2026-07-06 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
MAYO v. TULSA TOUGH, INC.
Plaintiff Timothy P. Mayo was injured during a bicycle race after a pedestrian walked onto the course, leading him to sue the event organizer, Tulsa Tough, Inc., for negligence and punitive damages. The appellate court affirmed the trial court’s summary judgment for the defendant, finding Mayo’s liability waiver valid because a cyclist-pedestrian collision was foreseeable. Additionally, the court ruled that a claim for punitive damages is considered an element of the underlying negligence claim rather than a separate cause of action.
2026-07-06 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Luther C. Parente v. Nelson Lefebvre, in his official capacity as Warden of the Department of Corrections
The Rhode Island Supreme Court decided whether discrimination claims under the Civil Rights Act are considered "actions of tort" under the State Tort Claims Act, a question certified from the appeals of incarcerated individuals Luther Parente and Eric Stewart. The court ruled that discrimination claims under the Civil Rights Act are actions of tort under the State Tort Claims Act. Under this interpretation, the intent of the General Assembly was to waive sovereign immunity for these claims.
2026-07-03 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Eaton v. Reese et al
Findings & Recommendations: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 26) should be granted because plaintiff's claims are untimely, barred by the Eleventh Amendment, or otherwise fail because plaintiff has not identified evidence sufficient to create a question of fact to support his claims. Because the only remaining defendants are unnamed, and the deadline to identify them has elapsed, the case should be dismissed in its entirety. These Findings and Recommendations will be referred to a district judge. Objections, if any, are due Thursday, July 23, 2026. If no objections are filed, then the Findings and Recommendations will go under advisement on that date. If objections are filed, then a response is due within 14 days after being served with a copy of the objections. When the response is due or filed, whichever date is earlier, the Findings and Recommendations will go under advisement. Signed on 7/2/2026 by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 7/2/2026.) (pvh)
2026-07-02 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Lacaze v. Vannoy
OPINION: IT IS ORDERED that petitioner's 28 amended and superseding petition for writ of habeas corpus under 22 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 6/26/2026.(pp)
2026-07-02 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Christopher R. Miller v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
Christopher Miller challenged his conviction resulting from a vehicle search after a traffic stop, leading the appellate court to affirm the evidence while vacating the trial court’s sentence; the court ruled that the judge erred by sentencing Miller to two years in prison when the jury had recommended one year, remanding the case for resentencing.
2026-07-02 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Hallums v. Alston
An officer sued attorneys over letters they wrote to law enforcement regarding his work status, which the defendants defended under the Hawaii Public Expression Protection Act. The Intermediate Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s decision to grant the motion to dismiss and award attorney fees. However, the court vacated the denial of sanctions and remanded the case, citing that the lower court failed to explain its reasoning for denying the sanction request.
2026-07-02 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)