Devastating Changes After Chevron Ruling? Essential Insights Now
The Supreme Court's 2024 Loper Bright decision ended 'Chevron deference,' explains Pierce County, Washington attorney Spencer Freeman. For forty years, courts had to defer to a federal agency's interpretation unless it was unreasonable—a very high bar. Now a challenger need only show the agency was wrong, which, in Freeman's view, makes it easier to hold regulators accountable in court.
Excerpt summaries from the video and transcripts · how we make them
Answered by Spencer Freeman · Pierce County, WA
Highlights
— what Chevron deference meant: courts bowing to an agency's reading
— why overturning an agency action used to be nearly impossible
— the new, lower bar for challenging an agency's interpretation
— how courts leaned on agency experts, and what changes now
— what the shift could mean for personal-injury and regulatory cases
Frequently Asked Questions
What did the Loper Bright decision do?
It ended 'Chevron deference'—for forty years courts had to defer to a federal agency's interpretation unless it was unreasonable.
Why was overturning an agency action so hard?
Because the old standard was a very high bar—you had to show the agency was unreasonable, which made challenges nearly impossible.
What's the new standard?
A challenger need only show the agency was wrong, a lower bar than proving it was unreasonable.
How did courts rely on agency experts?
Courts leaned on the agency's own experts, effectively deferring to them; that changes now that judges weigh the question more independently.
What could this mean for injury and regulatory cases?
It could make it easier to challenge regulators in court, with ripple effects for personal-injury and regulatory litigation.
→ Full interview on Attorneys.Media
More Legal Commentary answers
Legal news in Washington
Links to outside sources. Not written or reviewed by the attorney.