DEMO BUILD · corrected architecture · not attached to production DNS · noindex/nofollow · see all page types
AttorneysOnline.Directory
Home / Answers / Divorce Mediation / Mediation vs. Arbitration: What’s Better For Your Divorce?
Divorce Mediation · answered on camera

Mediation vs. Arbitration: What’s Better For Your Divorce?

Quick answer

For a divorce, is mediation or arbitration better? Usually mediation, explains Sarasota, Florida divorce attorney Bill Leininger, because arbitration is binding and, by public policy, can't decide custody—or often child support and alimony—even if both spouses agree. Arbitration suits business-flavored disputes like dividing a company or trade secrets; the average couple with a house and 401k rarely needs it.

Excerpt summaries from the video and transcripts · how we make them

Answered by Bill Leininger · Sarasota, FL

Highlights

0:25

— why binding arbitration never caught on in family law

1:09

— the limits: some states let only a judge set support and alimony

Frequently Asked Questions

Is mediation or arbitration better for divorce?

Usually mediation, because arbitration is binding and, by public policy, can't decide custody—or often child support and alimony—even if both spouses agree. Arbitration suits business-flavored disputes, while the average couple with a house and 401k rarely needs it.

What can't an arbitrator decide?

Custody, and in many states child support and alimony, since those are reserved for a judge—limits that keep arbitration from fitting most divorces.

→ Full interview on Attorneys.Media

Contact Bill Leininger
Answered by

Bill Leininger
Divorce Mediation For New York Residents

69 filmed answers · full profile →

Build note · one page per video, built from the directory database: this video’s own Quick answer, Law update where one applies, Highlights and Q&A, attributed to its attorney. Nothing on it is quoted verbatim and no interview text is reproduced — the full interview stays on Attorneys.Media, linked above.