Legal news archive
Every item ever ingested, 2119 total. Nothing is deleted or overwritten as new items arrive -- this page just paginates further back.
Jackson v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 8/13/2025. (kmd)
2025-08-13 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Shannon P. Green v. Edward C. McGee
The South Carolina Supreme Court reversed the court of appeals’ calculation of setoff in a motor vehicle accident where the jury found both defendants acted reckfully and willfully. The Court held that because the defendants’ conduct was determined to be reckless and willful, statutory apportionment of fault under the Contribution Act does not apply, resulting in Green receiving a specific net judgment against both drivers. The decision remanded for entry of judgment against McGee and Hudgins, leaving Green with the total balance of the verdict after deducting an initial settlement.
2025-08-13 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
THOMPSON et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES et al
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS - LPD's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 18), DCS's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 22), and MPD's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 24) are each GRANTED. Plaintiffs' Motion for Relief from Judgment (Dkt. 41) and Motion for Court Assistance (Dkt. 43) are DENIED. Leave to file a second amended complaint is granted, if it is not futile, and must be filed within 14 days of the date of this order. (SEE ORDER.) Copies sent pursuant to distribution list via US mail. Signed by District Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/11/2025. (TPS)
2025-08-11 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
USA v. Rantanen
OPINION AND ORDER denying 23 Motion to Suppress Evidence and denying 23 Motion for a Franks hearing beyond the July 10 evidentiary hearing as to Christopher Rantanen (1). Signed by Chief District Judge Christina Reiss on 8/11/2025. (law)
2025-08-11 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
State of New Jersey v. Victor Baverov
Victor Baverov appealed a fifth driving-while-intoxicated conviction, arguing that his attorney provided ineffective assistance by refusing to present a psychiatric defense and that he was entitled to a jury trial due to the custodial sentence. The Appellate Division concluded that neither contention had merit and affirmed the lower court's orders upholding his conviction and sentence.
2025-08-11 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Louis Jones, et al. vs. Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, et al.
Appellants sued the state after being informed they would receive only 40% of their approved 2022 Tort Victims Compensation Fund claims due to insufficient appropriations. The circuit court previously denied relief, finding the claimants were barred by sovereign immunity and administrative exhaustion, though it also found the payment calculation proper. The appellate court rejected these procedural defenses but affirmed the lower court’s judgment, concluding the Division’s calculation of payments was consistent with the law.
2025-08-05 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
OLSZEWSKI et al v. HUTCHINS et al
ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS granting 9 Motion to Dismiss By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (CCS)
2025-07-29 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Hawkins v. Region 8 IV-D Agency et al
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The Motion [#10] be GRANTED, and that Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Prevost be DISMISSED without prejudice. The Order to Show Cause [#30] is MADE ABSOLUTE. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Region 8 IV-D Agency, Larry Desbien, and IV-D Agency in Arapahoe County be DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any party may file objections within 14 days of service of this Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 7/29/2025. (ccuen, ) Modified on 8/1/2025 to change document type (angar, ).
2025-07-29 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Merithew v. City of Omaha
George Merithew, a retired police officer, sued the City of Omaha for retaliation under the Nebraska Fair Employment Practice Act for reporting a Palmer Consent Decree violation. The court affirmed the enforcement of a statute of limitations defense but reversed the district court’s summary judgment regarding the unbarred acts because genuine issues of material facts prevented entry of judgment as a matter of law, remanding the case for further proceedings.
2025-07-25 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Behrens et al v. US Bank, NA et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 56, 57, and 60 Motions to Dismiss and denying as moot 76 Motion to Change Venue. This action is hereby dismissed. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. Signed by Judge Leonard T Strand on 7/25/2025. (jag)
2025-07-25 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
EVERETT J PRESCOTT INC et al v. BEALL
OMNIBUS ORDER AND ORDER STAYING CASE dismissing 28 Motion ; granting 31 Motion to Vacate ; dismissing 36 Motion ; dismissing 46 Motion to Strike ; dismissing 51 Motion ; granting 52 Motion for Leave to File; dismissing 52 Motion ; dismissing 54 Motion to Amend. ; dismissing 55 Motion for Sanctions; dismissing 61 Motion to Strike ; dismissing 64 Motion ; dismissing 68 Motion ; dismissing 71 Motion to Dismiss; dismissing 75 Motion ; granting in part and dismissing in part 76 Motion to Seal; granting 83 Motion for Conference of Counsel; dismissing 85 Motion for Sanctions; dismissing 108 Motion to Compel; dismissing 111 Motion to Seal; dismissing 112 Motion to Unseal Document ; granting 116 Motion for Conference of Counsel; dismissing 119 Motion to Compel; dismissing 134 Motion for Order; dismissing 135 Motion for Oral Argument/Hearing; dismissing 27 Motion for Default Judgment By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (CCS)
2025-07-24 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
A.O., Individually, Plaintiff-Appellant v. LESTER E. COX MEDICAL CENTERS, d/b/a COX MEDICAL CENTER SOUTH, and COXHEALTH, Defendants-Respondents
Plaintiff A.O. sued a medical center alleging that an employee sexually assaulted her during an appointment, claiming negligence in hiring, supervision, and protection. The defendants moved for summary judgment, alleging that A.O. failed to produce a competent medical expert as required by statute. Although the appellate opinion indicates the decision was "affirmed," the provided text concludes without explaining the specific reasoning behind the ruling on the summary judgment motion.
2025-07-23 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
C.S., Appellant, vs. Missouri State Highway Patrol Criminal Justice Information Service; Lafayette Prosecuting Attorney, Respondents.
C.S. appealed a circuit court judgment that denied his amended petition to expunge a conviction for unlawful use of a weapon following his guilty plea to possession of a controlled substance. The court reviewed whether the weapon offense qualified as a "marijuana offense" under Article XIV, Section 2 of the Missouri Constitution. The court held that the offense was not a "marijuana offense" and affirmed the circuit court's judgment.
2025-07-22 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
WWSAF Special Partners Group, LLC (Series D) v. Costello, Valente & Gentry, P.C.
A Vermont trial court granted one law firm a share of another firm’s attorney's fees under the common-fund doctrine, reasoning the dispute arose from successful litigation against an insurer. The Vermont Supreme Court reversed this decision, determining that the trial court improperly expanded the doctrine to this case and remanded for summary judgment in favor of the defendant firm. The Court did not reach the lower court’s arguments regarding the calculation of damages during the cross-appeal.
2025-07-18 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Martin v. Meredith
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION with Prejudice; denying as moot 3 Motion to Authorize Service; denying as moot 4 Emergency Motion for Immediate Relief; denying as moot 5 Motion for Appointment of Pro Bono Counsel. The Court certifies that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. This file is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Mary K. Dimke. (LTR, Case Administrator) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.) Modified on 7/18/2025 to include appealability language (LTR, Case Administrator).
2025-07-17 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Matter of Dorfman
Attorney Richard Daniel Dorfman was convicted in Florida of vehicular homicide, and the Attorney Grievance Committee moved to disbar him, arguing this conviction serves as a predicate for automatic disbarment under New York law. The court agreed that the Florida statute is "essentially similar" to the New York felony of manslaughter in the second degree because both laws criminalize reckless driving resulting in death. Accordingly, the court granted the motion and ordered Dorfman disbarred with his name struck from the New York roll of attorneys, effective retroactively to his conviction date of December 10, 2024.
2025-07-17 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
In the Estate of QUENTIN LEE JONES, Deceased.
The Missouri Court of Appeals vacated a probate court’s decision to approve a final settlement of the Estate of Quentin Lee Jones because unresolved matters, including a Petition for Discovery of Assets and objections to the settlement, remained pending. The court ruled that the probate court acted without authority by finalizing the estate disbursement before resolving these outstanding issues.
2025-07-16 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Camp Carefree, Inc. v. Rockingham Cnty.
Plaintiffs challenged Rockingham County’s adoption of zoning amendments that rezoned a property to allow electronic gaming and other commercial uses, but the case was dismissed by the trial court for lack of standing. The appellate court reversed that decision, agreeing with the plaintiffs that their complaints sufficiently alleged standing to proceed with their declaratory judgment action.
2025-07-16 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Jerry Carl and Beth (Elizabeth) Steele vs. Jordan Hartman
Jordan Hartman appealed a consent judgment awarding his daughter’s maternal grandparents eight hours of monthly visitation, arguing that the child's adoption terminated their standing. The Missouri Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal, holding that Hartman is not a "party aggrieved" by the judgment and thus lacks statutory authority to challenge it.
2025-07-15 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Aleksandra Veljovic v. TD Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff Aleksandra Veljovic sued TD Bank and Zlata Cavka alleging that Cavka negligently notarized a document used in a Serbian divorce proceeding that led to Veljovic losing marital property. The trial court dismissed the claims based on the economic-loss rule and the lack of a special relationship between the parties. The Vermont Supreme Court agreed with the court’s conclusions and affirmed the dismissal of Veljovic’s negligence, negligent supervision, and respondeat superior claims.
2025-07-11 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent v. JAMES WILLIS PETERS, Appellant
Convicted of driving while intoxicated as a chronic offender, James Willis Peters appealed, arguing that a 2002 municipal conviction should not count toward his sentence because the definition of "driving" had changed in 1996. The court affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding the evidence was sufficient to establish that the 2002 conviction qualified as an intoxication-related traffic offense under the statute applicable to the current offense.
2025-07-09 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Rosberg v. State of Nebraska et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The plaintiff's complaint is dismissed. Leave to amend the complaint will not be granted because such amendment would be futile. On or before July 28, 2025, the plaintiff shall show cause why he should not be enjoined from filing further pro se cases in the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska regarding the state court proceedings dissolving his marriage without first seeking leave of court. The Clerk of the Court shall set a show cause deadline for July 28, 2025. Ordered by Senior Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (ADB)
2025-07-07 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Sharon Andersen v. Department of Health and Human Services
Sharon Andersen appeals a summary judgment regarding her claim of hostile-work-environment disability discrimination under the Maine Human Rights Act. The court concluded that she failed to make a prima facie showing of a continuing violation, affirming the lower court’s finding that her claim was time-barred.
2025-07-03 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
USA v. Osuegbu et al
ORDER as to Evette Betty Osuegbu: The Court DENIES Defendant Osuegbu's 171 Motion for Judgment of Acquittal, 172 Motion for New Trial, and 195 Motion for Release from Custody Pending Sentencing. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 6/30/2025. (kss)
2025-06-30 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
USA v. Rodriguez-Garcia
ORDER denying 16 MOTION to Suppress Evidence as to Jose Rodriguez-Garcia (1). So Ordered by Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty. (de)
2025-06-26 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
TAYLOR et al v. CARRIER GLOBAL CORPORATION et al
ORDER that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, (Doc. 90), is ADOPTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the ruling on Plaintiffs' Motion for Substitution of Party, (Doc. 78), is DEFFERED and this action is STAYED for sixty (60) days. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Substitute Party, (id.), shall be GRANTED without further notice upon filing of proof of such appointment with this court. Alternatively, Plaintiff's Motion to Substitute Party, (id.), shall be DENIED without further notice upon filing of proof of such denial with this court. IT IS ORDERED, absent prompt filing of either such proof, that Ms. Newlands SHALL file, within sixty (60) days of the issuance of this Order, either: (1) Notice providing a status report and indicating the progress and expected outcome of the probate proceedings or, (2) Notice that she does not intend to institute or pursue such proceedings. Should a Notice be received that Plaintiff does not intend to institute or pursue such proceedings, the Motion to Substitute Party, (id.), shall be DENIED without further notice and Mr. Newlands' claims against Defendant will be DISMISSED with prejudice. Should no proof of appointment, proof of denial, or any such Notice be filed within the sixty-day deadline, Plaintiff's Motion to Substitute Party, (id.), shall be DENIED without further notice and Mr. Newlands' claims against Defendant shall be DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 06/25/2025.(at)
2025-06-25 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Ciara Kilburn and Brona Kilburn v. Bill Simmon and Vermont Community Access Media, Inc.
The Vermont Supreme Court affirmed a jury verdict regarding claims by Ciara and Brona Kilburn against Vermont Community Access Media, Inc. and its employee Bill Simmon, who secretly recorded the sisters while they changed clothes and posted the videos online. The decision upheld a ruling that VCAM was liable for negligent supervision and awarded damages for the plaintiffs' emotional distress.
2025-06-20 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Flook v. Haynes
ORDER DENYING 1 PETITIONER'S WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, is DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice. The court further certifies that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 2253(c);Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). File is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Rice. (BM, Case Administrator)
2025-06-18 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Clifford C. Bain v. City of Cheyenne, a Municipality; and Edward Brookman, an Individual
Clifford C. Bain was injured in a motorcycle collision with a Cheyenne city bus, prompting him to challenge the $250,000 liability cap under the Wyoming Governmental Claims Act for being unconstitutional. The Wyoming Supreme Court ruled that the statute defines a limit on the waiver of governmental immunity rather than on damages, thereby upholding its constitutionality and affirming the district court.
2025-06-18 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
State v. Kordell L. Grady
Following a high-speed chase, Kordell Grady was ordered to pay restitution for damage to a law enforcement vehicle after he spoke with his attorney during a court hearing despite being warned that his statements could be overheard by the public and the prosecutor. The Wisconsin Supreme Court upheld the circuit court’s decision, holding that Grady never intended to have a confidential conversation with his counsel and therefore suffered no violation of his due process rights. Consequently, the court concurred that his unconfidential conversation during the restitution hearing was not privileged under Wisconsin law.
2025-06-13 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
CLARK CNTY. v. DIST. CT. (EGGLESTON)
The Nevada Supreme Court granted Clark County and a social worker’s petition for a writ of mandamus after deciding that the claims against them should be barred by qualified and discretionary-act immunity. The lawsuit involved a parent alleging he was coerced into signing temporary guardianship papers for his children under threat of permanent removal during a state investigation.
2025-06-12 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Fred Starliper v. Adrienne Johnson
This case involves an appeal by Fred Starliper regarding a 2019 motor vehicle accident where he was found solely at fault and awarded $109,476.12 in damages. The court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded the circuit court's order for further proceedings.
2025-06-11 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
State v. Chandanoeuth Hay
Chandanoeuth Hay appeals a jury conviction for ten counts stemming from a 2018 shooting in Providence, arguing that the trial justice erred in allowing a police sergeant to offer a lay opinion, denying a hearing pursuant to Franks v. Delaware, admitting testimony about unrelated shootings, and admitting certain photographs. The Rhode Island Supreme Court affirms the judgment of the Superior Court in light of these arguments.
2025-05-29 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
In the Matter of LeGault & LeGault
Lisa LeGault appeals a Circuit Court decision that utilized a formula to divide only the marital portion of her husband’s pension while awarding him the premarital portion, arguing that statutory provisions require all property to be subject to equitable distribution. The New Hampshire Supreme Court vacates the final divorce decree and remands the case for further proceedings.
2025-05-29 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Banner Life Insurance Company v. Vernard et al
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order denying 32 Pro Se Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants. The scheduling order and the trial management order are both vacated and the bench trial of this case, currently scheduled for 10/6/2025, is continued. Notice or Affidavit regarding any heirs or beneficiaries of Christian May to be filed within 45 days of the date of this order. Signed by Judge Leonard T Strand on 5/22/2025. (Copy to Defendants) (des)
2025-05-23 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Severson v. Gupta, et al.
Jacob Severson sued Sanford Health and Dr. Gupta for medical malpractice after cryotherapy complications but failed to submit the required expert affidavit within three months, arguing his claim fell under the "obvious occurrence" exception to the statute. The North Dakota Supreme Court held that laypeople do not possess sufficient knowledge of the procedure’s intricacies to deem the negligence obvious, and therefore affirmed the district court’s summary judgment based on this statutory requirement. The court also affirmed the district court's decision to deny Severson’s motion to amend his complaint after a responsive pleading had been served.
2025-05-22 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
USA v. Cunningham
ORDER DISMISSING 140 DEFENDANT'S SECTION 2255 MOTION WITH LEAVE TO RENEW as to Aaron Joseph Cunningham (1). A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Mary K. Dimke. (LTR, Case Administrator)
2025-05-13 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Young v. Rios et al
ORDER. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall file a formal suggestion of death, a motion for or stipulation of dismissal of claims against Defendant Hill, or other clarification as to Plaintiff's requested disposition of this action as it pertains to Defendant Hill. Signed by Judge Charles Goodwin on 05/09/2025. (jb)
2025-05-09 · via GovInfo (US GPO / USCOURTS)
Bakes v. Denver Health
The Colorado Court of Appeals considered whether claims brought under the Health Care Worker Protection Act are subject to the note requirement of the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act. The court concluded that potential HCWPA claims, regardless of whether a private right of action might exist, are subject to the CGIA’s prefiling notice requirement. Therefore, the appellate court affirmed the district court’s order dismissing the plaintiff’s claim for failing to provide the required notice.
2025-05-08 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Evoqua Water Technologies LLC v. Matthew Moriarty
Matthew Moriarty appeals the Superior Court’s dismissal of his amended counterclaim against Evoqua Water Technologies seeking declaratory relief and tort damages based on alleged false testimony. The trial justice granted the motion to dismiss on the basis of the litigation privilege, and the Supreme Court has affirmed that decision. The parties stipulated to the dismissal of the remaining underlying action and counterclaim.
2025-04-29 · via CourtListener (Free Law Project)